What are some of the book's themes? Love, friendship, betrayal, war and layers of lies. They all played a important role in the story. After reading this story more than once, I find the time period a bit curious. PTSD is something that was recently recognised so why set a story so far back to the point of it being unknown? It’s a fantastic story and the writing is refreshing but the time period really bothered me. Did the book end the way you expected? No one in the book club saw the ending coming. It was a surprise. Some readers may find that the ending leaves you with a heavy heart and emotionally unsettled but when Michael has to deal with so much on his mind, I don’t think consolation comes easy. What I liked about the whole book – It was a fast read, adventurous and believable. The characters were likable and the triangle they were in was plausible. At first, it's easy to become angry with Michael and you start to misunderstand Paul who seems to good to be true but as Paul challenges Michael’s emotions and the truth comes out, the reader becomes part of their lives. Disclosure - As a Quality Reads Book Club member, I received a free copy of this book from the author via Orangeberry Book Tours in exchange for my honest review.
What did you think was the most interesting part of the book? When Sam found out her dad was murdered too. Each chapter had a new secret for the reader. I think this is what really kept me going.
Did the plot pull you in or did you feel you had to force yourself to read the book? Some chapters pulled me in but some chapters when both characters lost themselves in each other and the author forgot about the reader, it was as if you were forcing yourself to read someone else's letters.
What were the main themes of the book? Adventure and coming of age. Justin and Adam follow their Aunt Isabel on a trip to Europe. When one of them discovers what he thinks is a meaningless piece of paper, their world becomes topsy turvy and they soon find themselves deep in a mystery they know nothing about.
Did the plot pull you in or did you feel you had to force yourself to read the book? Every bit of this book was interesting and it never felt like I was forcing myself to read it. If the author is able to have public readings at schools or even share public readings online it would be such a thrill for children to discover his work.
Which did you find more appealing, the introduction or the conclusion? Neither. It was when the twins were stripping the boat house that the story got really interesting for me. The actual fact about why they were separated and what kept them apart. In some ways, this story was a lot like Atonement by Ian McEwan.
How did the main character change during the novel? Guinevere is enjoying life and then she learns that she is engaged to be married at 13 and she runs away. She couldn't bear the thought of being married to anyone at age and was initially angry with King Arthur. As she sees the situation someone else's perspective, she definitely grows up.
Formatting / Appearance - I received a review copy and there were no issues for me. I did think there were one too many exclaimation marks in the story but to each his own and other readers may not agree with me.
How does the pacing of the story feel? When we first received the book, some of us at the book club were expecting for the some of the stories to be slow or uninteresting. We were wrong. Every story is able to captivate the reader even if it doesn't change his or her perception about death.
What was the author's purpose or purposes in writing this book? On the one hand, I think he wanted to show readers the ins and outs of an investigation especially one in a small town. On the other hand, I think the author wanted to stress the fact that police officers receive very little credit for what they do.
Which secondary character resonated most with you and why? Difficult to pick only one but if I must, then it would be David. He had adulthood thrust upon him and I really did feel sorry for him. He wants to do so much more and is yet restricted by his age which also means he tends to end up in more trouble than his mother would like.
What is the central idea discussed in the book? The book makes a feeble attempt at arguing that the Old Testament chapters in the bible are not necessary. The author deconstructs each chapter but only highlights the negative points so readers think that this is all the Old Testament is about.
Did the plot pull you in or did you feel you had to force yourself to read the book? The book club members had conflicting thoughts about this. Most chapters were easy to read and pulled the reader in. But some chapters seemed to drag more than others and it didn't seem like there was any point.
Which did you find more appealing, the introduction or the conclusion? The introduction sucked me in and then I didn't stop. Many of us the book club had problems putting down this book for the simple reason we simply had to know where and how it all ended.
What was the most revealing scene to you? When Juliet and Catalina are torturing Armaros. I was expecting the torture but I wasn't expecting it to be written in such a fluid manner. Any other time, I would have been disgusted with such a scene but the author's words carry you through the scene with a little sympathy, hate and anger.
How did the main character change during the novel? Based in New York City, Karen starts experiencing some strange things in present day. While she and the reader are quick to dismiss these as figments of her imagination, someone tries to kidnap her. Reeling from the fright, she escapes to Roma Nova where her journey of self-discovery becomes more complicated. Karen goes from fearful to heroine. Loved the character development for her.